false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
SHM Converge Scientific Abstract ePoster Gallery
Interspecialty Othering: A Qualitative Analysis of ...
Interspecialty Othering: A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Interpersonal Conflict at the Time of Admission From the Emergency Department
Back to course
Pdf Summary
This qualitative study explored interpersonal conflict between Emergency Medicine (EM) and Internal Medicine/Hospital Medicine (IM) physicians during hospital admission discussions, a key point of interspecialty interaction. Conducted at a public/county hospital and level 1 trauma center, the study used semi-structured Zoom interviews with 18 participants: 9 IM/Hospital Medicine faculty and 9 EM providers (4 faculty, 5 residents). Using constructivist grounded theory and Social Identity Theory, the authors analyzed how clinicians perceive and navigate conflict.<br /><br />Three major themes emerged. First, “Us vs. Them” specialty identity often primes conflict. Participants described admissions conversations in battle-like terms, reflecting assumptions that the other specialty is an opponent rather than a partner. Second, “Vying for Control” showed how organizational structure and perceived power imbalances escalate tensions. Clinicians sometimes felt pressured, devalued, or forced to “argue” for admission decisions, which reinforced defensiveness and frustration. Third, some interactions became successful when physicians transformed parallel, adversarial discourse into shared problem-solving. This happened when clinicians expressed humility, asked questions, and focused on the patient as a common goal.<br /><br />The study concludes that interspecialty othering—driven by stereotypes, misaligned expectations, and pre-existing biases—can turn ordinary disagreements into perceived incompetence or work avoidance, worsening conflict and emotional strain. These conflicts can leave lasting “emotional residue” that harms communication, professional meaning, and wellbeing. The authors suggest strategies to reduce conflict, including acknowledging its emotional effects, understanding its structural and cultural roots, and reframing conversations around patient-centered teamwork, bedside collaboration, curiosity, honesty, and mutual teaching.
Asset Subtitle
Maralyssa Bann
Meta Tag
Author List
Ashley Amick, Bjorn Watsjold, Caitlin Schrepel, John Ilgen, Joshua Jauregui, Maralyssa Bann, Stefanie Sebok-Syer
Category
Research
Concept
Interspecialty Othering
Concept
Physician Interpersonal Conflict
Concept
Patient
Concept
Specialty Identity
Concept
Us vs Them
Distinguished
Non-Finalist
Presenter Organization
Harborview Medical Center-University of Washington
Presenting Author
Maralyssa Bann
Track
Communication
Keywords
Emergency Medicine
Internal Medicine
Hospital Medicine
interspecialty conflict
hospital admission
Social Identity Theory
constructivist grounded theory
physician communication
patient-centered teamwork
organizational power imbalance
Interspecialty Othering
Physician Interpersonal Conflict
Patient
Specialty Identity
Us vs Them
×
Please select your language
1
English