false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
SHM Converge Scientific Abstract ePoster Gallery
Innovating to Improve Hospitalist Feedback on Clin ...
Innovating to Improve Hospitalist Feedback on Clinical Decision Support Alerts
Back to course
Pdf Summary
This project evaluated new ways to collect real-time hospitalist feedback on clinical decision support (CDS) alerts. The motivation was that electronic health records and alert fatigue can contribute to clinician burnout, reduce satisfaction, and negatively affect patient safety. Traditional feedback methods such as surveys or focus groups often lack specificity and are difficult to act on quickly.<br /><br />In collaboration with Clinical Informatics, CDS, and Hospital Medicine teams, the health system created a five-question custom survey to gather immediate feedback on high-priority alerts. The survey was embedded into seven selected alerts in late July 2024. It assessed alert utility, usability, clinical relevance, and alignment with the “Five Rights of CDS” framework. The system later shifted to a vendor-provided feedback tool that was rolled out across approximately 400 alerts in October 2024.<br /><br />The custom survey collected 72 responses between July and October 2024. After the vendor tool launched, it generated 1,956 responses by March 28, 2025, averaging about 20 to 70 responses per day. Alert ratings generally ranged from 1.4 to 2.2 out of 5, and the most common score was 1. However, 43% of responses did not include a numeric rating, making analysis more difficult. Free-text comments still provided useful positive and negative insights, but responses with both a rating and comments were the most actionable.<br /><br />A key strength of the feedback system was closed-loop communication: the Clinical Informatics team acknowledged feedback from users, and a spike in unrated responses helped identify and fix a new alert quickly after deployment.<br /><br />Overall, embedding feedback links directly into alerts greatly increased the volume and usefulness of clinician input. The authors conclude that meaningful feedback, timely analysis, and action on results are essential to improve CDS quality, reduce alert fatigue, and support future AI-driven clinical tools.
Asset Subtitle
Leigh Anne Goodman
Meta Tag
Author List
Corneliu Antonescu, Leigh Anne Goodman, Nikhil Sood, Vikeen Patel
Category
Innovations
Concept
Clinical Decision Support
Concept
Alarm Fatigue
Concept
EHR Alert
Concept
CDS Improvement
Concept
Closed-Loop Communication
Distinguished
Non-Finalist
Presenter Organization
University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix
Presenting Author
Leigh Anne Goodman
Track
Technology in Hospital Medicine
Keywords
clinical decision support
hospitalist feedback
alert fatigue
electronic health records
clinician burnout
custom survey
vendor feedback tool
alert usability
free-text comments
closed-loop communication
Clinical Decision Support
Alarm Fatigue
EHR Alert
CDS Improvement
Closed-Loop Communication
×
Please select your language
1
English