false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
SHM Converge Scientific Abstract ePoster Gallery
'Hunting' to Do the Right Thing: An Ethical Analys ...
'Hunting' to Do the Right Thing: An Ethical Analysis of Huntington's Disease Testing in a Critically Ill Patient
Back to course
Pdf Summary
This case describes a critically ill 53-year-old woman with recurrent melanoma and a family history of Huntington’s disease (HD). During her ICU course, her husband, who was her health care power of attorney, requested HD testing to help guide goals-of-care decisions. A test was initially ordered, but the patient later improved enough to be approached directly and she declined testing. After she declined, her condition worsened again, and the husband continued to press for testing.<br /><br />Further interdisciplinary review with Genetics, Palliative Care, and Ethics revealed that the patient had previously received an indeterminate HD result and had repeatedly said she did not want repeat testing. The husband believed a positive result would make comfort-focused care more acceptable, but he could not explain how a negative or indeterminate result would affect decisions.<br /><br />The authors conclude that HD testing would not have changed acute management or clarified immediate goals of care. Ethically, the patient’s autonomy took priority over the proxy’s request, especially because she had already declined testing. Privacy concerns also mattered, since family members could learn information the patient may not have wanted shared. From a beneficence and nonmaleficence perspective, testing offered no immediate medical benefit and risked psychological harm, distraction from urgent care, and inappropriate use of inpatient resources, since HD testing typically requires genetic counseling.<br /><br />The case supports the decision to refuse the proxy’s request for genetic testing. The authors recommend early involvement of palliative care, clinical genetics, and ethics teams, along with “hard stop” safeguards for inpatient genetic testing. They also emphasize that HCPOA authority is limited and does not override a competent patient’s prior or current wishes.
Asset Subtitle
Paul Ossman
Meta Tag
Author List
Ashley Allen, Jennifer J. McEntee, Paul Ossman
Category
Clinical Vignettes
Concept
Huntington Disease Testing
Concept
Patient Autonomy
Concept
Privacy
Concept
Beneficence
Concept
Nonmaleficence
Distinguished
Non-Finalist
Presenter Organization
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine
Presenting Author
Paul Ossman
Track
Adult
Keywords
Huntington's disease
genetic testing
ICU ethics
patient autonomy
health care proxy
palliative care
clinical genetics
informed refusal
end-of-life decisions
ethics consultation
Huntington Disease Testing
Patient Autonomy
Privacy
Beneficence
Nonmaleficence
×
Please select your language
1
English